tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post3460134089399803426..comments2023-12-26T21:03:04.768+08:00Comments on Hong Kong Media Buster 踢爆香港傳媒: Intellecutal Moronyellowcowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15343428105756639953noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post-43607027807220661512007-09-14T14:24:00.000+08:002007-09-14T14:24:00.000+08:00這樣顯示了明報寫社評人的知識水平差勁, 斷章取義, 分析片面, 沒有深度.這樣顯示了明報寫社評人的知識水平差勁, 斷章取義, 分析片面, 沒有深度.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post-26306284510972694632007-09-02T02:42:00.000+08:002007-09-02T02:42:00.000+08:00Stay tuned, I am write an article on Stephen McInt...Stay tuned, I am write an article on Stephen McIntyre and his busting of Hansen and Hockey Stickyellowcowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15343428105756639953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post-15541834338853153642007-09-01T17:59:00.000+08:002007-09-01T17:59:00.000+08:00hello 黃牛,話雖如此...譬如. 比較毛澤東, 甚麼Darfur盧旺達波斯尼亞都只是小菜一碟...hello 黃牛,<BR/><BR/>話雖如此...<BR/><BR/>譬如. 比較毛澤東, 甚麼Darfur盧旺達波斯尼亞都只是小菜一碟. (毛語: "請客食飯"而已.) 但沒關係的. "作為"一個新中國的知識份子, 我們依然可以讚頌他的打油詩出色. 面不紅, 耳不赤.<BR/><BR/>所以, 明報斷章直取其而需, 並無不妥.<BR/><BR/>我們可以這樣看的: 雖然Peter Singer說了不少傻話, 但他對愛護動物界實在作了"不可磨滅的貢獻". 蓋棺而論, 他的功過也在六四之比. uh, 歷史自有公論.<BR/><BR/>:p<BR/><BR/>p.s. 最近有聽聞Stephen McIntyre這個人嗎?Pen Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10013611858893708900noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post-86888168736780227052007-08-30T21:31:00.000+08:002007-08-30T21:31:00.000+08:00Bravo!Bravo!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21348005.post-15945918509039074282007-08-30T11:20:00.000+08:002007-08-30T11:20:00.000+08:00又一篇以人廢言代表作,明報社評只是引述彼德辛格一句話去支持其論點,高能的黃牛不去評這句話而去說彼德辛...又一篇以人廢言代表作,明報社評只是引述彼德辛格一句話去支持其論點,高能的黃牛不去評這句話而去說彼德辛格的其他,這是以事論事嗎?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com