Saturday, September 09, 2006

布殊沒有承認什麼「秘密監獄」

蘋果9月8日報導美國總統布殊「首次承認CIA在全球確有秘密監獄,拷問恐怖組織阿蓋德14名高層,以套取重要情報,粉碎恐怖襲擊陰謀。」

這是布殊講話的原文節錄:

  • Many are al Qaeda operatives or Taliban fighters...it has been necessary to move these individuals to an environment where they can be held secretly [sic], questioned by experts, and -- when appropriate -- prosecuted for terrorist acts.
  • a small number of suspected terrorist leaders and operatives captured during the war have been held and questioned outside the United States, in a separate program operated by the Central Intelligence Agency.
  • But I can say the (questioning) procedures were tough, and they were safe, and lawful, and necessary.
  • I want to be absolutely clear with our people, and the world: The United States does not torture. It's against our laws, and it's against our values. I have not authorized it -- and I will not authorize it.

布殊根本沒有承認什麼「秘密監獄」和「拷問」, 傳媒可以對其講話有自己的推測, 但不應該把說話塞進布殊嘴裏。

9月11日: 阿布哈里卜(Abu Ghraib)監獄最近由伊拉克政府接管, 囚犯的意願是"we want the Americans to come back"

10月4日補充: No Evidence for Prize-Winning Story

6 comments:

王牛 said...

黃牛說不是秘密監獄是可信,因為監獄條支出數會好大,我估呢條會計開支數項目名稱會是秘密囚房。
蘋果記者推測什麼?我估用錯字眼啫,佢老板食美國茶禮的。

牛王 said...

事件真是情緒受困這麼簡單? 事件的重點, 但明報沒有告訴讀者(正治正確?), 的是這名男子是名阿富汗回教徒, 數星期前才由阿富汗回到美國, 兇徒被截停時是在一所猶太人社區中心附近。

唔係呀!佢正字正確,唔比得手民之誤架。

Anonymous said...

YELLOW COW不用多些這類令人竊笑的所謂踢飽,怎引得我們常來這兒?這網也是需要有人click的,情況就好像一本便利或蘋果日報般,不嘩眾,怎得讀者?

cowdum said...

真是「匪」夷所思,他以美國佬再到伊拉克扶植另一個政權就有人權?或美國佬來統治伊拉克就有人權?

yellowcow said...

Sad but true.

cowdum said...

送那「匪」往美國服刑重更有人權呀!

Shit but true.